Towards Transformative Soil Science: Who am I in relation to my research?
Corresponding Author
W. Wiersma
Soil Chemistry Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Soil Biology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence
W. Wiersma, Soil Chemistry Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Email: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Investigation
Search for more papers by this authorD. E. Lopez
KIT – Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
W. Wiersma
Soil Chemistry Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Soil Biology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence
W. Wiersma, Soil Chemistry Group, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Email: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Investigation
Search for more papers by this authorD. E. Lopez
KIT – Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The paradigm of modernity is associated with human detachment from soil as the agricultural and affective foundation of modern societies. The focus on soil as a resource has created increasingly exhausted landscapes. Soil science is well placed to (re)build the urgently needed connection between humans and nature by generating evidence for soil functioning and, perhaps most importantly, by establishing linkages with diverse types of soil knowledge and integrating them in collaborative solutions. Such transdisciplinary solutions can be achieved by transforming current ways of doing soil science, which begin with soil scientists. Anchored in feminist and critical thinking, we used the ‘reflecting and doing’ framework (Lopez et al., 2023) to demonstrate how reflexivity can help soil science to become a transformative space. By partially dissolving the mind–heart and human–soil dualisms, we can foster a way of generating soil knowledge that emerges from the relations within and beyond the human Self. Such an approach is relatively new in academic soil science, which relies heavily on the scientific method as a detached form of knowing that privileges mind over body, reason over emotion, culture over nature and production over reproduction. We argue that this journey starts with (re)positioning ourselves as soil scientists in relation to our research and advance a Transformative Soil Science that recognizes soil knowledge as situated and embodied and that identifies soil as the main ally for a sustainable world.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
REFERENCES
- Berhe, A. A., & Ghezzehei, T. A. (2021). Race and racism in soil science. European Journal of Soil Science, 72(3), 1292–1297.
- Bouma, J. (2018). The challenge of soil science meeting society's demands in a “post-truth”, “fact free” world. Geoderma, 310, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.017
- Bouma, J. (2019). How to communicate soil expertise more effectively in the information age when aiming at the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Soil Use and Management, 35(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12415
- Bouma, J., & McBratney, A. (2013). Framing soils as an actor when dealing with wicked environmental problems. Geoderma, 200-201, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.02.011
- Bridges, E. M., & Catizzone, M. (1996). Soil science in a holistic framework: Discussion of an improved integrated approach. Geoderma, 71(3–4), 275–287.
10.1016/0016-7061(96)00015-8 Google Scholar
- Chilisa, B. (2017). Decolonising transdisciplinary research approaches: An African perspective for enhancing knowledge integration in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 12(5), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0461-1
- Churchman, G. J. (2010). The philosophical status of soil science. Geoderma, 157(3–4), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.018
- Colfer, C. J. P., Sijapati Basnett, B., & Ihalainen, M. (2018). Making sense of ‘intersectionality’: A manual for lovers of people and forests. CIFOR.
- Esbjorn-Hargens, S., & Zimmerman, M. E. (2011). Integral ecology: Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Shambhala Publications.
- Grunwald, S., Mizuta, K., Ceddia, M. B., Pinheiro, É. F., Wilcox, R. K. K., Gavilan, C. P., Ross, C. W., & Clingensmith, C. M. (2017). The meta soil model: An integrative multi-model framework for soil security. In D. J. Field, C. L. S. Morgan, & A. B. McBratney (Eds.), Global soil security (pp. 305–317). Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_27 Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. J. (2013). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In M. Wyer, M. Barbercheck, D. Cookmeyer, H. Ozturk, & M. Wayne (Eds.), Women, science, and technology (Vol. 3, pp. 455–472). Routledge.
- Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822373780 Google Scholar
- Harding, S. (1986). The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(4), 645–664.
- Hartemink, A. E. (2006). The future of soil science. Wageningen.
- Hartemink, A. E. (2008). Soils are back on the global agenda. Soil Use and Management, 24(4), 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00187.x
- Hartemink, A. E. (2023). Into the Pedocene—Pedology of a changing world. European Journal of Soil Science, 74(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13399
- Hartemink, A. E., & McBratney, A. (2008). A soil science renaissance. Geoderma, 148(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.10.006
- Howard, A. (2006). The soil and health: A study of organic agriculture. University Press of Kentucky.
- Ives, C. D., Freeth, R., & Fischer, J. (2020). Inside-out sustainability: The neglect of inner worlds. Ambio, 49(1), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01187-w
- Jenny, H., & Stuart, K. (1984). My friend, the soil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 39(3), 158–161.
- Kirschenmann, F. (2009). Comprehending soil within the context of the land community. In E. Landa & C. Feller (Eds.), Soil and culture (pp. 227–238). Springer.
- Kohl, E., & McCutcheon, P. (2014). Kitchen table reflexivity: Negotiating positionality through everyday talk. Gender, Place and Culture, 22(6), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2014.958063
10.1080/0966369X.2014.958063 Google Scholar
- Leopold, A. (1970). A sand county almanac. Ballantine.
- Longino, H. E. (2017). Feminist epistemology. In J. Greco & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to epistemology (pp. 325–353). Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/9781405164863.ch14 Google Scholar
- Lopez, D. E., Bailey, A., Farnworth, C. R., Rietveld, A., & Gartaula, H. (2023). Designing for change through “reflecting and doing”: The CGIAR Community of Practice on gender-transformative research methodologies. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1179503
10.3389/fsufs.2023.1179503 Google Scholar
- Lyons, K. M. (2014). Soil science, development, and the “elusive nature” of Colombia's Amazonian plains. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 19(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlca.12097
10.1111/jlca.12097 Google Scholar
- Mason, E., Gascuel-Odoux, C., Aldrian, U., Sun, H., Miloczki, J., Götzinger, S., Burton, V. J., Rienks, F., Di Lonardo, S., & Sandén, T. (2024). Participatory soil citizen science: An unexploited resource for European soil research. European Journal of Soil Science, 75(2), e13470.
- McAlvay, A. C., Armstrong, C. G., Baker, J., Elk, L. B., Bosco, S., Hanazaki, N., Joseph, L., Martínez-Cruz, T. E., Nesbitt, M., & Palmer, M. A. (2021). Ethnobiology phase VI: Decolonizing institutions, projects, and scholarship. Journal of Ethnobiology, 41(2), 170–191.
- Mertens, D. M. (2021). Transformative research methods to increase social impact for vulnerable groups and cultural minorities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110515. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211051563
- Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Jones, A., & Robinson, D. A. (2024). A 1 billion euro mission: A soil Deal for Europe. European Journal of Soil Science, 75(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13466
10.1111/ejss.13466 Google Scholar
- Patzel, N. (2009). The soil scientist's hidden beloved: Archetypal images and emotions in the scientist's relationship with soil. In E. Landa & C. Feller (Eds.), Soil and culture (pp. 205–226). Springer.
- Peake, L. J. (2017). Feminist methodologies. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. A. Marston (Eds.), International encyclopedia of geography (pp. 1–10). John Wiley and Sons.
10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1149 Google Scholar
- Puigde la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x Google Scholar
- Puigde la Bellacasa, M. (2013). Encountering bioinfrastructure: Ecological struggles and the sciences of soil. Social Epistemology, 28(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.862879
10.1080/02691728.2013.862879 Google Scholar
- Puigde la Bellacasa, M. (2015). Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715599851
- Puigde la Bellacasa, M. (2019). Re-animating soils: Transforming human–soil affections through science, culture and community. The Sociological Review, 67(2), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119830601
10.1177/0038026119830601 Google Scholar
- Richter, D. D., Bacon, A. R., Mobley, M. L., Richardson, C. J., Andrews, S. S., West, L., Wills, S., Billings, S., Cambardella, C. A., Cavallaro, N., DeMeester, J. E., Franzluebbers, A. J., Grandy, A. S., Grunwald, S., Gruver, J., Hartshorn, A. S., Janzen, H., Kramer, M. G., Ladha, J. K., … Zobeck, T. M. (2011). Human-soil relations are changing rapidly: Proposals from SSSA's cross-divisional soil change working group. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75(6), 2079–2084. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0124
- Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.
- Rose, H. (1983). Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 9(1), 73–90.
- Schneidewind, U., Singer-Brodowski, M., & Augenstein, K. (2016). Transformative science for sustainability transitions. In H. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, J. Grin, & J. Scheffran (Eds.), Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace (pp. 123–136). Springer Cham.
10.1007/978-3-319-43884-9_5 Google Scholar
- Staffa, R. K., Riechers, M., & Martin-Lopez, B. (2022). A feminist ethos for caring knowledge production in transdisciplinary sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 17(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01064-0
- Steketee, A. M., Archibald, T. G., & Harden, S. M. (2020). Adjust your own oxygen mask before helping those around you: An autoethnography of participatory research. Implementation Science, 15(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01002-1
- Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014). Connecting diverse knowledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio, 43, 579–591.
- Toland, A. R. (2023). Soilkin. Environmental. Humanities, 15(3), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-10746023
10.1215/22011919-10746023 Google Scholar
- Yaalon, D. (2000). Soil care attitudes and strategies of land use through human history. Sartoniana, 13, 147–159.